<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storing .js files and .css files in &#8216;js&#8217; and &#8216;css&#8217; directories in Rails 2.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelucid.com/2008/11/29/storing-js-files-and-css-files-in-js-and-css-directories-in-rails-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelucid.com/2008/11/29/storing-js-files-and-css-files-in-js-and-css-directories-in-rails-22/</link>
	<description>Lightweight ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Bushell</title>
		<link>http://thelucid.com/2008/11/29/storing-js-files-and-css-files-in-js-and-css-directories-in-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Bushell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelucid.com/?p=487#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>This really goes against the convention over configuration ideology of rails (which you already know), and imo - isn&#039;t one worth toying with. May as well start playing with the naming conventions, because someone simply doesn&#039;t like what it&#039;s called. I&#039;m in agreeance with you - I think css/js are much better directory names, but changing the application to match my own taste in naming is a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really goes against the convention over configuration ideology of rails (which you already know), and imo &#8211; isn&#8217;t one worth toying with. May as well start playing with the naming conventions, because someone simply doesn&#8217;t like what it&#8217;s called. I&#8217;m in agreeance with you &#8211; I think css/js are much better directory names, but changing the application to match my own taste in naming is a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://thelucid.com/2008/11/29/storing-js-files-and-css-files-in-js-and-css-directories-in-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelucid.com/?p=487#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

For images you could redefine as follows:

&lt;pre lang=&quot;ruby&quot;&gt;
ActionView::Helpers::AssetTagHelper::ImageAsset::DIRECTORY = &#039;custom_images&#039;.freeze
&lt;/pre&gt;

Jamie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>For images you could redefine as follows:</p>

<div class="wp_syntax"><div class="code"><pre class="ruby" style="font-family:monospace;"><span style="color:#6666ff; font-weight:bold;">ActionView::Helpers::AssetTagHelper::ImageAsset::DIRECTORY</span> = <span style="color:#996600;">'custom_images'</span>.<span style="color:#9900CC;">freeze</span></pre></div></div>

<p>Jamie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Spencer</title>
		<link>http://thelucid.com/2008/11/29/storing-js-files-and-css-files-in-js-and-css-directories-in-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelucid.com/?p=487#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>Nice idea, I had to do something like this once to replace a legacy system with a bunch of external dependencies on its stylesheets.

What about images?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea, I had to do something like this once to replace a legacy system with a bunch of external dependencies on its stylesheets.</p>
<p>What about images?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
