<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proprietary CSS rules &#8211; Are we returning to 1995?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelucid.com/2007/10/30/proprietary-css-rules-are-we-returning-to-1995/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelucid.com/2007/10/30/proprietary-css-rules-are-we-returning-to-1995/</link>
	<description>Lightweight ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://thelucid.com/2007/10/30/proprietary-css-rules-are-we-returning-to-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://88bcddf7-b862-47f8-8788-3a0abd4c8ab7#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>How are things Nuno? We now have Miguel working with us thanks to your recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are things Nuno? We now have Miguel working with us thanks to your recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuno</title>
		<link>http://thelucid.com/2007/10/30/proprietary-css-rules-are-we-returning-to-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-2198</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://88bcddf7-b862-47f8-8788-3a0abd4c8ab7#comment-2198</guid>
		<description>Your right. You can like a standard or dislike it. You might hate the fact the most standards on data are xml but they are the standards. We all should work on improve them and not impose our very own closed dialect.

If they forked css and extended it now the process should be to merge it into branch. Talking like a developer, ofc. But the same applies to standards..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right. You can like a standard or dislike it. You might hate the fact the most standards on data are xml but they are the standards. We all should work on improve them and not impose our very own closed dialect.</p>
<p>If they forked css and extended it now the process should be to merge it into branch. Talking like a developer, ofc. But the same applies to standards..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
